Die Haltung der US-liberalen zur Ueberrraschenden Nobelreis
Die Liberale US-Gruendung Heritage (“Heritage Foundation”) kongratuliert
den Nobelpreistraeger Obama sehr herzlich, aber hofft; dass der Mann den
Preis im Interesse opferenden US Buerger Akzeptiere, und ihn zu gunsten
aller, deren Opfer einer besseren und sichereren Welt gewidmet seien,
annehme
Unten ist eine Zusammenfassung der Einstellung US-Liberalen
Folgender Text ist von Heritage veroeffentlicht worden:
As fellow Americans we always take pride in the achievements and awards of
our compatriots. While we congratulate President Obama for winning the
Nobel Peace Prize today, he should accept the award on behalf of the
American people for all our many sacrifices to make the world a better
place. Everyone recognizes, however, that the Nobel Committee awarded the
prize to President Obama on the basis of hope for the future than
achievements of the past. The politicization of this award saddens us when
dissident leaders in China, Zimbabwe, Cuba and other dictatorships are
passed over despite substantial achievements and not just hope for things
to come.
Recent Entries
Guest Blogger: Rep. Erik Paulsen on Greater Free Trade Means More Jobs
Afghanistan–Strategy Gone Wild
Baucus Bill’s Out of Pocket Costs
Obama Won’t Meet With Dalai Lama
In the Green Room: Amb. Kurt Volker on NATO and Afghanistan
More recently, Former President Jimmy Carter won the award in 2002, and
Former Vice President Al Gore won the award in 2007 for his environmental
activism. It is clear to everyone that in recent years, the Nobel Prize has
taken on a form of a political football that Europeans are able to lob into
U.S. domestic politics when they desire to.
President Obama has built high expectations for himself since he began his
campaign in 2007. He was going to turn around Afghanistan, the “good war.”
He was going to restore America’s leadership role internationally, and
deliver global consensus on issues as weighty as a nuclear arms or
universal emissions standards. So far, he has been given little time to
show results to match this “promise.” While some fellow nations of the
world have embraced him, other former allies like Poland, the Czech
Republic and others have condemned his policies. While he has spoken of a
nuclear free world, French President Nicolas Sarkozy called this vision
“naïve.” While he has delivered speeches looking to bridge the Muslim and
western worlds, he has also failed to recognize that Muslim women and men
are fighting against a Taliban intent on oppression, poverty and
terrorism.
The Nobel Peace Prize is not the Nobel Intentions Prize. Past winners have
risked life, freedom and their families to deliver world change. Former
Polish President Lech Walesa who led the Solidarity movement to free Poland
from brutal Russian oppression. Or Mother Theresa who was given the award
after decades saving children from famine, or Begin and Al-Sadat in 1978
who made a giant leap forward in Middle East security, bridging the gap
between Israel and Egypt.
The Nobel Prize committee should have given President Obama the
opportunity to meet these weighty expectations rather than diminish past
achievements with a public relations award. However, the Nobel organization
is a private one. And they have every right to give this award to whomever
they choose. The real measure of success for President Obama will be how
well he serves the American people, safeguards our sovereignty and keeps
the nation secure, free and prosperous.
QUICK HITS
With 20% of Federal Housing Administration loans facing possible
foreclosure, the FHA is in danger of needing a bailout.
Despite record high unemployment, the Obama administration has frozen oil
and gas development on 60 drilling sites in Utah.
Due to the complete failure of his $787 billion stimulus package,
Democrats in Congress are now pushing for a second stimulus plan in time
for the 2010 elections.
The Real Cost of the Baucus Bill: $2 Trillion.
According to Quinnipiac University, American voters oppose Obama health
care plan 47%-40% and 57% of voters say Congress should not approve a
health care overhaul with only Democratic votes.
________________________________________
comment
print
forward
donate
END DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL
American Energy, American Jobs, American Security. Click here to let Obama
know that you want to end our dependence on foreign oil and create
thousands of job in America. FreeOurEnergy.com
Know anyone who shares your conservative values and principles and may
want to receive The Heritage Foundation newsletters? Please refer them to
Heritage today!
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
The Heritage Foundation - 214 Massachusetts Ave. NE, Washington, DC 20002
Call us at 202-546-4400
Re: Die Haltung der US-liberalen zur Ueberrraschenden Nobelreis
Timothy Slater <T.SLATERann2006
ä
t
hotmail.de on 16.10.09 re "Die Haltung der US-liberalen zur Ueberrraschenden Nobelreis":
Aha>
Aha> Die Liberale US-Gruendung Heritage ("Heritage Foundation") kongratuliert
Tja, über Sachen, von denen man keine Ahnung hat, sollte man lieber nicht
öffentlich schreiben.. Die Heritage Foundation ist eine "konservative",
sprich rechte, nicht linke, politische Stiftung/Meinungsfabrik, und nicht
einmal dem FDP-artigen Manchesterliberalismus zuzurechnen.
Aha> den Nobelpreistraeger Obama sehr herzlich, aber hofft; dass der Mann den
Aha> Preis im Interesse opferenden US Buerger Akzeptiere,
Aha>
Aha> Folgender Text ist von Heritage veroeffentlicht worden:
Aha> As fellow Americans we always take pride in the achievements and awards
Aha> of our compatriots. While we congratulate President Obama for winning
Aha> the Nobel Peace Prize today, he should accept the award on behalf of the
Aha> American people for all our many sacrifices to make the world a better
Aha> place.
Es handelt sich offensichtlich um den gleichen Text, der auch bei einer Reihe
der anderen "üblichen Verdächtigten" platziert, und von ihnen veröffentlicht
wurde.
Nur ist die Heritage Foundation hier vom Original abgewichen: während die
anderen, die ehe schon lange als Kriegshetzer bekannt sind ("Ist der Ruf erst
ruiniert, lebt's sich gänzlich ungeniert"), verlangt haben, Obama solle den
Preis im Namen des Pentagon als die größte Friedensinitiative annehmen,
spricht HF vom "amerikanischen Volk" statt "amerikanischen Militär".
Aha> achievements of the past. The politicization of this award saddens us
Das würde etwas glaubwürdiger klingen, wenn sie sich je in der Vergangenheit
beschwert hätten, als dieser Preis an Terroristen und Kriegsverbrecher
verliehen wurde. Ganz im Gegenteil: sie führen ein solches Beispiel auch noch
als nachahmenswert an:
Aha> ... or Begin and Al-Sadat in 1978 who made a giant leap forward in
Daß sie natürlich recht haben mit dem Punkt ihrer Kritik, daß der Preis
diesmal nur für leere Versprechungen ohne Taten verliehen wurde, steht auf
einem anderen Blatt.
- TS
--
Tim Slater
| /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN |
| \ / AGAINST HTML IN E-MAIL |
| X AND NEWS |
| / \ |